Lies, damn lies and...

Statistics used by media firms
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/39187.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/03/us/03survey.html

Would you like to see a complete, reliable archive of photographs of the emergency work at the Pentagon on 9/11?

Me too.

Try finding a reliable comprehensive one via Google search.

Gee, you'd think that someone would have gone to the trouble to compile a set of links to reliable web images.

I wanted to link to a shot by Dan Lopez showing the lawn in front of the hole where the plane allegedly plunged through. You can probably reach it via Google, but thus far I haven't been able to come up with a simple way to show you that photo.

At any rate, the interesting thing about the picture is that all the light poles, as well as a highway sign, are intact, though the jet purportedly swept in at first-floor level. As you look at Lopez's picture, it seems apparent that the jet would have had to have flown in the direction you are looking.

The government got around that problem by having the jet come in at a very sharp angle to the wall, whence it allegedly clipped some light poles not in Lopez's picture.

But, this required that the jet ricochet off one of the interior reinforced walls before disintegrating. That mass, though pulverized would have possibly ricocheted again off the opposed reinforced wall.

I know those walls were strong, but the kinetic energy of that plane should have done more damage to the first reinforced wall. Also, the debris pattern was, as far as I can tell, pretty much straight back (approximately perpendicular to the rear of that structure, with maybe a bit of fanning out). BUT, the debris pattern should have been sharply asymmetrical, in accord with the ricochet(s).

Scientist's death questioned.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article25853.htm