Jurist sees 9/11 plot,
sends case to Hague 
An Italian jurist with long experience fighting Mafiosi and terrorists is referring the 9/11 case to the international criminal court of justice at the Hague for prosecution of those complicit in what he sees as a covert U.S. operation that was intended to increase power of those in control of security and stir up war fever.

The judge's referral to the prosecutor is explained in a letter to the Journal of 9/11 Studies.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters.html

http://www.icc-cpi.int/Menus/ICC/Structure+of+the+Court/Office+of+the+Prosecutor/

Ferdinando Imposimato, honorary president of the Italian supreme court and a former senator who served on the anti-Mafia commission, charges in a letter that the 9/11 attacks were a "global state terror operation permitted by the administration of the USA, which had foreknowledge of the operation yet remained intentionally unresponsive in order to make war against Afghanistan and Iraq."

He added that the attacks were an "instance of the strategy of tension enacted by political and economic powers in the USA to seek advantages for the oil and arms industries" and likened it to what he said were CIA activities in Italy to carry out bombings in order to undermine the once politically powerful Communists by blaming Marxist radicals for the terrorism.

Imposimato, who has authored seven books on international terrorism and state corruption, charged that there is "much evidence of this strategy," both circumstantial and scientific.

He writes:

"The reports of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), November 20, 2005, set forth the following conclusions. The airplanes that struck each of the twin towers caused a breach as well as an explosion evidenced by a giant fireball. The remaining jet fuel flowed onto the lower floors, sustaining the fires. The heat from the fires deformed the building structures and both towers collapsed completely from top to bottom. Very little that was of any size remained after these events except steel as well as aluminum fragments and the pulverized dust from the concrete floors.

"World Trade Center 7 also collapsed--in a way that was inconsistent with the common experience of engineers. The final NIST report claimed that the plane strikes against the twin towers were responsible for all three building collapses: WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7. All three buildings collapsed completely, but Building 7 was not hit by a plane. WTC7’s collapse violated common experience and was unprecedented."

The jurist, a grand officer of Italy's Order of Merit, cited research by architect Richard Gage and engineer Jon Cole, whose analyses point to controlled demolitions from planted charges and agreed with theologian David Ray Griffin's reasoning for urging the hypothesis of controlled demolition.
 
The judge cited much evidence developed at the "Toronto Hearings," a forum set up by professionals who are sharply critical of the official 9/11 narratives.
http://torontohearings.org/

The judge wrote that Peter Dale Scott, a witness at the hearings, "demonstrated that there was a systematic CIA pattern of withholding important information from the FBI, even when the FBI would normally be entitled to it."

He cited former U.S. counter-terror chief Richard Clarke's interviews on European television to show that the CIA knew that a major attack was imminent and saw this and other material as implicating the CIA chief at the time, George Tenet, in a murderous conspiracy.

Recently leaked presidential briefing material shows that the CIA knew a big attack was coming, but the theory was put forth that its warnings were brushed off by President Bush whose neoconservative aides saw a political trick to divert attention from their ambitions against Iraq, which was eventually assigned much blame for the 9/11 attacks by Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.